The opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States : on the act of the 3d, of April 1792, delivered in February term, 1805, in the case of the lessee of H.I. Huidekoper vs. James Douglass : after argument on questions stated by the Circuit Court of the United States, in and for the Pennsylvania district of the Third Circuit, for the judgement and decision of the Supreme Court
Proofs of the corruption of Gen. James Wilkinson, and of his connexion with Aaron Burr, : with a full refutation of his slanderous allegations in relation to the character of the principal witness against him
"The originals of all the documents ... except the copies from the records of the Supreme Court ... and the papers laid before Congress ... are lodged with Mr. D.W. Coxe, in Philadelphia, who will shew them to any person desiring an inspection of them. ..."--Advertisement, p. [2], 2nd count.
Copyright July 13, 1809 by Daniel W. Coxe.
Last page blank.
"Errata."--Page 199.
Jasper Yeates's Colonial Law Library.
Yeates's signature at top of title page.
Book number 614 as assigned by Yeates.
Includes bibliographical references.
Shaw, R.R. American bibliography,
Reese, W.S. Best of the West,
Summary
Daniel Clark, born in Ireland and a schoolboy at Eton, came to New Orleans in 1786, to join his uncle of the same name. He was prominent in the city, became an American citizen, and in 1806, was elected a delegate to Congress. Shortly afterward he broke with Wilkinson, with whom he had been intimate, and in this book gives much evidence of the General's treachery. Clark strives to prove that Wilkinson was a pensioner of Spain from 1794 to 1803; and an accomplice of Aaron Burr in treasonably plotting a separation of the states. The case is clearly and forcibly put and is a strong one, with information about Jefferson's administration of the West, and the causes there working towards a secession in the early years of the Republic. [from Google Books]
