Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme court of judicature; and in the Court for the trial of impeachments and the correction of errors in the state of New York. [1806-1823]
from January term 1799, to January term 1803, both inclusive: together with cases determined in the Court for the Correction of Errors, during that period, by William Johnson.
Book numbers 392, 393, and 394 as assigned by Yeates.
Contents
Vol. 1. From January term, 1799, to July term, 1800 -- Vol. 2. From October term, 1800, to October term, 1801 -- Vol. 3 From January term, 1802, to January term, 1803, inclusive ; with an appendix [People v. Croswell. Feb. 13, 1804]
Summary
"Together with cases determined in the Court for the correction of errors, during that period."--T.p.
Reports of cases in the county courts of the Fifth circuit, and in the High courts of errors & appeals, of the state of Pennsylvania. [1791-1799] And Charges to grand juries of those county courts
Vol. 2-4 have title: Reports of cases ruled and adjudged in the several courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania, held at the seat of the federal government.
Also known as: U.S. reports.
Imprint varies.
Includes indexes.
Jasper Yeates's Colonial Law Library.
Yeates's signature at top of title page.
Book numbers 368b, 369, 270, and 371 as assigned by Yeates.
v. 1. The cases from the beginning of Easter term, 1802 to the end of Easter term, 1804 -- v. 2. The cases from the beginning of Trinity term, 1804 to the period of Lord Redesdale's resignation of the Great Seal [i.e. 1807].
The trials of William S. Smith and Samuel G. Ogden for misdemeanours had in the Circuit Court of the United States for the New-York district in July, 1806 : with a preliminary account of the proceedings of the same court against Messrs. Smith & Ogden in the preceding April term
Publisher description: In our society, the recognition of talent depends largely on idealized and entrenched perceptions of academic achievement and job performance. Thinking Styles bucks this trend by emphasizing the method of our thought rather than its content. Psychologist Robert Sternberg argues that ability often goes unappreciated and uncultivated not because of lack of talent, but because of conflicting styles of thinking and learning. Using a variety of examples that range from scientific studies to personal anecdotes, Sternberg presents a theory of thinking styles that aims to explain why aptitude tests, school grades, and classroom performance often fail to identify real ability. He believes that criteria for intelligence in both school and the workplace are unfortunately based on the ability to conform rather than learn. He takes the theory a step further by stating that 'achievement' can be a result of the compatibility of personal and institutional thinking styles, and 'failure' is too often the result of a conflict of thinking styles, rather than a lack of intelligence or aptitude. Sternberg bases his theory on hard scientific data, yet presents a work that remains highly accessible.
Reports of cases adjudged in the Superior Courts of Law and Equity, Court of Conference, and Federal Court : for the state of North-Carolina from the year 1797 to 1806
